Silicone Implants and Cosmetic Use
The latest data does not favor ban on silicone
implants. From all available sources, it seems that it is high time that
FDA approves silicone implants for cosmetic applications, which is already
in use for all practical purposes in the market. It is only a misgiving,
which somehow crept in the minds of the FDA committee. The committee needs
to remove the final legal tangle. Thus, a rationale and reasonable
perception would suit the agency to mention that enlarged or reconstructed
women become part of active post – marketing observation or inspection.
The adequate data sufficiently denies any linkage between systematic
disease and implants.
Hitherto, hardly any specific information conducted by at
least twenty studies display any connectivity of implants with intact or
broken connective tissue ailments or disease. More so, in case some
related problem or a minor ailment was reported, it was all after a very
long period of time. Any
serious study, which was conducted for finding the fall out of the
silicone implants ultimately, was not successful. However,
notwithstanding the fact that the report was above all encouraging, some
motivated feminist organizations are trying to distort the facts, to serve
their interests, or merely so because they are playing into
the hands of some vested interests.
It has been noticed
by some concerned bodies
of the society that ever
since women from larger section of the society started opting for
silicone
implant surgery, many
so-called feminists were
upset. The reasons are best known to them as to why they started
developing a lobby against implantation. It may be to influence the
opinions of the Food and Drug Administration advisory panel members so
that the continuous approval of silicone gel-filled implants should
be rejected, declaring the devices as unsafe, unwarranted, and dangerous
for the implant application. While, the findings are quite contrary to the
projected biased opinions displayed sometimes by such feminist
organizations, the data supports silicone implants.
Regrettably, due to some misguided and fabricated information
somehow, FDA had to resort to the unfortunate step of not favoring
silicone implants. However, the latest position is that FDA is now coming
to understand the whole reality related to the issue of silicone implant
use, and again is coming to the rescue of the silicone application,
so much so that it has almost lifted the ban. The positive perception is
that women from across the society can use silicone implants. Thus,
women are totally free to go for these kinds of implants at their own will
after mastectomy operation, if they agreed to be tracked by Food and Drug
Administration.
In many quarters, from health subcommittee of the Commerce
Committee and the House Energy, the groups including National Council of
Women’s Organizations, National Women’s Health Network insisted that
silicone leakage and rupture could direct to serious health hazards.
Needless to say these all fears are founded on purely anecdotes. Having looked into the previous data, it becomes crystal clear that rupture incidence rates,
project that near about
20% of the modern implants rupture
within the domain of ten
years of
cosmetic reconstruction, enlargement
or augmentation. Yet , there is hardly
any greater incidence of
connective tissue disease in
ladies having ruptured
implants with respect to
those without implants,
corresponding to exhaustive analyses
from the Institute of Medicine (1999), the National Cancer Institute
(2004), the U.K. Independent Panel on Silicone Gel Implants (1998).
Related to this issue are the famous and popular
implants in South America and Europe - the third generation strategy and
devices. They contain sturdy silicone gel - clear gelatin - that
characteristically maintains its form and shape even if torn. The
fourth-generation strategy or devices likened to gummy bears are for
practical reasons in the pipe line at the FDA, plus are in use in many
developed nations, except in Canada or U.S.A.
Again, mischievous propagation by certain vested
groups is regarding detection of cancer. The women’s lobby
interprets it in such a way that can confirm interference of implants with
mammogram results. This is merely a dangerous half-truth, and a negative
projection of the two aspects of the same coin. True, implants
quite frequently reduce visibility of tissue on mammography,
however, the point of concern is does it delay diagnosis. Here the
agreement is very strongly related to the women with implants, who undergo
or develop cancer, is not diagnosed at the next stage than women without
implants. Continued existence of implanted women having cancer is
similar as cancer patients without reconstruction or implantation.
Thus, there can be perceived a lot of lobbies of feminist or
organizations casting negative pronouncements, and at times even
prejudiced, who are against women body alteration merely to please men.
But needless to point out, however, that a woman has complete birth right
to do whatever suits to their body, until she does not harm any body in
the society.
To conclude overall perceptions, it becomes abundantly clear
that silicone implants and cosmetic use continue to make their
presence felt in the market. Though there was unintended ban for sometime,
nevertheless the popularity of silicone implants could not be
blocked for the willing women cross-section of the American, and Western
society in particular, and many nations of the world in general. Precisely
because of this specific reason, the latest data do not favor ban on
silicone implants for any interested party of the society.
Role of Silicone Implants in Reconstruction
How Far Along is the Approval Process of the FDA?
The Role of the Manufacturer (Mentor) Working on the Project of Implants
Surgery Procedure and Techniques
Silicone Implants and Cosmetic Use
Application of the New Silicone Implants for Cancer Victims
Issues Associated With Silicone Implants
The Role of New Technology in Making People Safer With Silicone Implants
Effects on Pregnancy, Lactation, and Children
Enlargement and Public Opinion
Removal and Replacement of Silicone Implants
Copyright 2005
Silicone Implants (www.silicone-implants.info)
All rights reserved
Information and opinions provided here are never to be construed as medical advice. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health.